What’s Getting in the Way of Fairer National Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage?

A woman in a bright yellow dress holds a baby in a colorful blue shirt. Both are smiling.
A woman and child in Rwanda. (Photo: USAID)

Through the LHSS-JLN learning exchange, health practitioners from Bangladesh, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, and Thailand are sharing successful country experiences and promising practices to institutionalize explicit national priority-setting processes for health.

A shared vision for an institutionalized, explicit process

A circular blue graphic divided into four sections in which the four key defining features of institutionalized, explicit priority setting are described.
Figure 1. Consensus definition of institutionalized, explicit priority setting

Moving towards institutionalizing an explicit national priority-setting process

A table that describes the four factors that influence institutionalization of explicit national priority-setting processes, in terms of their ability to inhibit or enable.
Figure 2. Factors that influence institutionalization of explicit national priority-setting processes

What comes next?

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store